Claude’s legal error: AI Di Anthropic cites non -existent sources in the classroom | Llm machine learning tutorial pdf | Large language models tutorial for beginners | Openai | Turtles AI

Claude’s legal error: AI Di Anthropic cites non -existent sources in the classroom
During a cause on copyright against Universal Music, the AI Claude generated an incorrect quote, pushing Anthropic’s lawyer to officially apologize. The accident rekindles the debate on the reliability of the AI ​​in the legal sector
Isabella V17 May 2025

 

An error generated by the AI ​​Claude of Anthropic led to an incorrect legal quote in a cause for copyright violation, forcing the company’s lawyer to apologize publicly.

Key points:

  • Claude, the AI di Anthropic, generated a legal quote with incorrect title and authors.
  • Anthropic’s lawyer admitted the error, calling him "embarrassing and involuntary".
  • The cause involves Universal Music Group and other musical publishers, who accuse anthropic of copyright violation.
  • The case highlights the challenges related to the use of AI in the legal context.


During a cause intended by Universal Music Group and other musical publishers against Anthropic for alleged copyright violation, it emerged that the AI Claude of the company generated an incorrect legal quote. The quote, used in a declaration of the expert of Anthropic data, Olivia Chen, contained an inaccurate title and authors, although the year of publication and the link were correct. Anthropic’s lawyer, Ivana Dukanovic, admitted the error, attributing it to insufficient manual control and defining it "embarrassing and involuntary".

The cause, started in 2023, accuses Anthropic of having used copyrights protected by the Ai Claude, thus allowing the generation of musical texts almost identical to the original ones. Musical publishers claim that Claude can reproduce famous songs, such as Katy Perry’s "Roar" and "I Will Survive" by Gloria Gaynor, without authorization. Federal judge Susan Van Keulen ordered Anthropic to respond to the accusations, underlining the seriousness of the situation.

This accident fits into a wider context of concerns about the reliability of the AI ​​in the legal sector. Previously, other lawyers were criticized for using materials generated by AI without adequate verification. Despite this, legal startups based on AI continue to attract significant investments. For example Harvey, a startup that uses AI to assist lawyers, is in negotiations to collect over 250 million dollars, with an evaluation of 5 billion dollars.

The story highlights the challenges and responsibilities related to the integration of AI into the legal system, underlining the need for rigorous checks and greater awareness in the use of these technologies.