AI Judge in Fury-Usyk Match: A Controversial Verdict | Generative ai certification google | | Traditional ai examples | Turtles AI

The historic rematch between Tyson Fury and Oleksandr Usyk saw the innovative introduction of an AI judge, who, in an experimental experiment, offered a score even less favorable to the Briton than traditional judges. The AI raised controversy.

Key points:

• First AI judge in boxing history: the experiment promoted in Saudi Arabia has turned the spotlight on a new era of technological refereeing.
• Stricter AI scoring: Fury scored only two rounds, with a 118-112 score for Usyk, sharper than human judges.
• Debate on use of technology: the Briton strongly rejected the idea that AI could be part of the future of boxing.
• Picky reaction from Fury: in addition to criticizing AI, the boxer extended his distrust toward other modern technologies.

On Saturday night in Riyadh, the rematch between Tyson Fury and Oleksandr Usyk wrote a new chapter in the history of boxing, not only because of the technical level of the fight, but also because of the presence of an innovative AI judge, which we had already told you about in our previous article. This technology, presented as an innovation in terms of impartiality and scoring accuracy, was put to the test during the main event, although it did not affect the official outcome. However, the unofficial ruling of the AI judge, a humanoid system capable of analyzing every move and decision in the match, provoked heated reactions.

While human judges Gerardo Martinez, Patrick Morley and Ignacio Robles had awarded victory to Usyk by a unanimous score of 116-112, the AI verdict was even more merciless toward Fury. According to the tech judge, Usyk dominated eight of the 12 rounds, leaving the Briton with only the second and fifth, while the first and last were ruled a draw. This resulted in a score of 118-112, further amplifying the feeling of an inferior performance by Fury.

At the press conference after being informed of the AI score, Fury did not hide his frustration, attacking both the technology and the concept of a future dominated by computers. “This is the future? It’s total nonsense,” he said, categorically rejecting the idea that AI could play a role in sports judging. “Let’s give jobs to human beings, not machines. And while we’re at it, down with electric cars too!” he added, in his usual polemical tone.

The experiment, promoted by The Ring Magazine and the Saudi General Entertainment Authority, has been met with curiosity but also skepticism. While it represents an attempt to bring greater transparency to the world of boxing, it has also fueled debate about how far technology can replace human judgment, especially in such complex and interpretation-prone disciplines. Fury, for his part, has hinted that he has no interest in seeing further developments in this direction.

Boxing questions an increasingly technological future, but the ring, for many, remains a field where the human soul should continue to be the ultimate judge.