Elon Musk surprises everyone by supporting the AI ​​Safety Act | ChatGPT app | OpenAI italiano | ChatGPT login | Turtles AI

Elon Musk surprises public opinion with his support for California’s controversial bill SB 1047, aimed at regulating AI. The founder of xAI, known for his critical positions on AI, stands in favor of regulation, in contrast to the opposition expressed by OpenAI.  

Key Points:

• Elon Musk supports bill SB 1047 that mandates security measures for AI models.
• xAI, Musk’s company, would be subject to such regulations, despite promising to leave California.
• OpenAI opposes the bill, preferring a less restrictive alternative.
• Musk’s position marks a significant divergence in the debate over AI regulation.

Elon Musk recently took a stand in favor of SB 1047, a California legislative proposal that would force companies developing large AI models to implement and document security measures aimed at preventing potential harm resulting from the use of such technologies. In a comment published on This bill could have direct repercussions on xAI, the artificial intelligence company founded by Musk himself, which would therefore be forced to comply with the new regulations.

The position expressed by Musk fits into a long-term context, in which the founder of Tesla and SpaceX has often expressed concerns about the potential risks of unregulated AI. From the beginning of his career, Musk has emphasized the importance of regulatory oversight for advanced technologies, arguing that any product or technology with potential implications for public safety should be subject to appropriate regulation. His statement in support of SB 1047, therefore, aligns with this long-term vision.

In parallel, OpenAI, one of the main rival organizations in the field of AI, recently expressed its dissent towards the Californian law proposal, instead promoting an alternative bill that proposes a less binding approach and which, according to the organization, could encourage more agile innovation that is less burdened by stringent regulations. This disagreement between Musk and OpenAI highlights differences within the industry regarding the best way to manage and regulate the development of AI technologies.

SB 1047 represents one of the first concrete attempts by a state government to impose a stringent regulatory framework on the development of AI. The law would require companies to put in place specific measures to mitigate risks related to their technology and to carefully document those procedures. Musk’s position, therefore, takes on particular relevance, as he is not only a thought leader in the field of technology, but also the founder of a company that would be directly affected by the law in question.

This move by Musk, seen by many as surprising, demonstrates the complexity of the ongoing debate over the regulation of AI, a rapidly evolving sector that raises questions of safety, ethics and innovation.

Musk’s support for SB 1047 could represent a turning point in the legislative process, further fueling the debate over how to balance the promotion of technological innovation with the need to protect the public from the potential risks of AI.